The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has thrown out lower court orders barring the state from certifying dozens of contests since the Nov. 3 election.
In a recent Republican lawsuit seeking to block the victory of President-elect Joe Biden on the battlefield, the state Supreme Court unanimously threw out three days old injunctions, saying Pennsylvania filed the underlying lawsuit a few months after the law allowed the year-old mail-in-voting law.
The judges also commented on the lawsuit’s inconsistent demand that the entire election be canceled early. “They failed to allege that even a mail-in ballot was fraudulently transmitted or counted,” Justice David Wecht wrote in a statement.
State Attorney General, Democrat Josh Shapiro, called the court decision “another victory for democracy.”
The weekly lawsuit, led by Pennsylvania Republican Congressman Mike Kelly, challenged the state’s mail-in voting law as unconstitutional.
As a solution, Kelly and other Republicans were required by law to wipe out 2.5m mail-in ballots – most of them Democrats – or to wipe out election results and elect a state Republican-controlled legislature. Pennsylvania presidential election.
The request of state legislators to elect Pennsylvania presidential election also flies in the wake of nearly a century of state law that gives the state the power to elect voters to the popular vote, Wecht wrote.
Two Republicans of the High Court, along with five Democrats, opposed the settlement, splitting with Democrats in arguing that the lawsuit could undermine the Constitution – the underlying arguments of the lawsuit.
On Wednesday, Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough, who was elected Republican in 2009, ordered the suspension of the rest of the contest, including clear contests for Congress.
A day earlier, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf had confirmed that Joe Biden had won the presidential election in Pennsylvania. Biden Beat President Donald Trump With more than 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, Trump won in 2016.
Wolfe appealed to McCullough’s decision to the state Supreme Court, saying there was no “potential justification” for it.
After the defeat The Federal Court of Appeals ruled Friday To dismiss a special challenge to the Pennsylvania outcome and to recall a district judge who likened the president’s unsubstantiated and flawed lawsuit to a “monster of Frankenstein”.
A three-member federal panel last week unanimously upheld a lower court ruling rejecting claims made by Trump’s legal team led by the former mayor of New York. Rudy Giuliani, Voting in Pennsylvania damaged by widespread fraud.
“Free and fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. The allegations of injustice are serious. But calling the election unfair does not do that. The allegations require specific allegations and proof. We are not here either, ”Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote for the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The judge rejected the Republican request to reverse the vote confirmation as “thrilling”: “Voters, not lawyers, elect the president. Ballots, not abbreviations, determine elections.” [The] Campaign claims are not eligible. ”
The ruling, the Trump team’s 38th court defeat in election lawsuits across the country, reiterated its earlier opinion on the complaint by U.S. District Judge Matthew Bran Giuliani after hearing five hours of oral arguments last week. The lawsuit was probably funded by Braun:
With the Associated Press