Have you ever watched the Olympics to see who would win the silver medal in the various disciplines?
Neither am I.
But that’s what we’re going to do on Monday.
Let’s look at the election results to see who will come second.
That will become a big suspense.
Like the last novel by David Fonkinos (Number two), tells what happened to the young actor who would have been Harry Potter if Daniel Radcliffe hadn’t attended the casting sessions.
A strange voting mode
Because we already know who the big winner is on Monday evening.
This is Francois Legault.
Even if he does a lot of bad campaigning, polls say that his party is in danger of getting only 37% votes.
Think about it: you can dictate Quebec’s destiny for four years and 63% of Quebecers (and even more, if you count those who don’t, pass laws that will have a profound effect on the daily lives of all citizens. ‘Neither came) voted for you!
Then we wonder why so many people are not voting…
“Why should I bother to vote if the candidate and party I support in my constituency have no chance of winning? »
We participate in the democratic process because our vote counts.
It weighs in the balance and makes a difference.
Unfortunately, with our peculiar voting system, a political party can get 15% of the popular vote – which is very respectable – but end up with zero MPs in the National Assembly.
What is your legitimacy as prime minister if more than six out of 10 Quebecers do not vote for you?
The question is valid.
Opponents of a mixed proportional system say vote fragmentation would make it more difficult to elect a majority government, thereby weakening Quebec’s position in negotiations with Ottawa.
Francois Legault led a large majority government for four years. Did this make Ottawa more attentive to Quebec’s requests?
As the PSPP recalls, Quebec made 21 requests to the federal government.
We have 21 rejections.
And if 63% of voters refuse to vote for you, there must be a reason, right?
The composition of the National Assembly should reflect this fact!
The Happy Shipwrecked
On Wednesday, I said that the mandate from the CAQ was like turning the pontoon around.
No waves, no nausea.
I don’t know what happened in that campaign, there were too many Coolers Is it under control? However, the CAQ pontoon suffered almost the same fate SS MinnowGilligan’s boat is supposed to be on a short three-hour cruise, but the captain (Legalault), the professor (Drainville), the millionaire (Fitzgibbon), Mary Ann (Guilbault) and others are stranded on a desert island. Ginger (Saint-Hilaire).
No matter: CAQ wins the same.
Because one pontoon, even without a compass, can go faster than four rowboats.
More Stories
“Avatar: The Way of the Water”: The Great Return of James Cameron
To end polarization
Pokemon says goodbye to Ash and Pikachu!