In custody since 2008 after mental illness, singer Britney Spears will address a Los Angeles court on Wednesday and will have to speak out on the terms of this legal agreement, which will lose much of her autonomy financially and in his personal choices.
Also read: Under legal supervision, Britney Spears will go to court
Also read: Britney Spears Guardianship New Documentary
Also read: New permanent coach for Britney Spears?
Like the other protagonists in this case the star does not have to be physical and speaks through an internet link during the intervention that takes place behind closed doors.
Samuel Ingham, a court-appointed lawyer for Britney Spears, said in a previous hearing that “Britney wants to go straight to court.”
The 39-year-old singer has not been given any details on what she wants to raise in court, but these are very strict terms of the legal contract she has been living in since 2008, when she came to court. The most popular underworld at the time.
Similar to the custodial rule, the deal is that the decisions regarding the singer will be made especially by her father Jamie Spears, with whom she has had a difficult relationship for a long time.
These arrangements have been fiercely contested in recent years, with Britney Spears’ attorney now asking the court to appoint a professional guardian to replace Jamie Spears, who is currently handling her case with her father.
Samuel Ingham has already said the singer is “afraid of his father” and Britney Spears may want to express her fears and demands in person before Judge Brenda Penny on Wednesday.
Despite occasionally being on social networks to stay in touch with his fans, the star refrained from publicly discussing his guardianship or difficult relationship with his father.
However, according to court documents cited by the New York Times, Britney Spears repeatedly expressed clear opposition to her trusteeship terms, which she felt were too much.
“She felt that custody had become a means of repression to control her,” the forensic investigator in charge of the case wrote in a 2016 report. The rule placed upon her was that she had “too much control” over, “too much.”
According to a report quoted by the newspaper, Britney Spears informed the researcher that she wanted the conservation regime to end as soon as possible. “She + is frustrated with getting the benefit and says she works and brings in money, but she pays everyone around her,” the document continues.
The New York Times, for example, under this supervision, the singer must pay not only her own legal fees, but also the guardians who compete for her claims in court.
All of these controversies revived the #FreeBritney campaign (#LibrageBritney in French) set up by some fans on the street and on social networks, convincing her to keep the singer under surveillance against her and send calls using coded on her Instagram account. .
Interest in Britney Spears’ legal and psychological saga has been revived with the recent release of the documentary “Framing Britney Spears”, which explores the star’s declining mental health and his sometimes brutal media treatment.
After divorcing Kevin Federline in 2006, and losing control of her children in 2007, Britney Spears appeared barefoot at a gas station or shaving her head.
Her preservation did not prevent the artist from being professionally active: she has released three albums and has given a series of residency appearances in Las Vegas, as well as some appearances on television shows.
However, in January 2019, she announced that she would be suspending her artistic activities until further notice.
More Stories
“Avatar: The Way of the Water”: The Great Return of James Cameron
To end polarization
Pokemon says goodbye to Ash and Pikachu!